And
COLD!
It was gray and polluted.)
IT'S ABOUT RENEWABLE RESOURCES!
"War is the father of all and the king of all."
Heraclitus
New wine is ready to be poured into the same old bottles.
The Democrats will replace the Republicans.
The Corporate Puppet Masters will still rule the roost.
The White House is just an imperial Bed & Breakfast place for the new leaders.
War is good business.
The business of America is business.
Do you get it?
War is ancient.
War is eternal.
Get it?
Peace is for pansies and fools.
Get it?
They came.
They saw.
They lied.
They lied.
They tortured.
They bombed.
They lied.
They lied.
They came.
They saw.
They bombed.
They tortured.
They lied.
They lied.
They lied.
IT'S THE OIL STUPID!
PART I:
Children go where we send thee
Say Dubya and Cheney
How shall we send thee?
We're gonna send thee
one by one
With a gun, with a gun
One by one
With a gun, with a gun
One for the little bitty baby
That was born, born
Born in
Who now will fight in
Our Armageddon!
PART II:
Bush and Cheney
Dashing through the snow
In a one-horse open sleigh
Through the fields they go
Torturing all the way
Shells of bombs on bob-tail ping
Making spirits fight
What fun it is to ride and sing
A slaying song tonight.
Jingle bells, jingle bells
Jingle all the way
Oh what fun it is to ride
In a one-horse open sleigh
Press Conference by the President
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
THE PRESIDENT:
Good morning. I hope you all enjoyed the holiday reception at the White House as much as Laura and I enjoyed it. We took an inventory of the silverware, and this year only a few pieces were missing (SINCE MY UNNECESSARY PRE-EMPTIVE WAR IN IRAQ HAVE TAKEN ALL OF THE OTHER PIECES).
Congress passed a good energy bill. The legislation I signed yesterday will reduce our country's dependence on foreign oil by increasing the supply of alternative fuel sources and increasing fuel economy standards. It demonstrates
(AND IT COMES SEVEN YEARS AFTER I WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT BECAUSE DICK'S FRIENDS AT HALLIBURTON AND MY OIL CRONIES WANTED TO MAKE AS MUCH DOUGH AS POSSIBLE FROM THAT BLACK GOLD!)
Finally, Congress reached agreement on a spending bill to fund the day-to-day operations of the federal government. They passed this bill without raising taxes.
(BUT YOU CAN BE AS CERTAIN AS MY WAR THAT TAXES WILL EVENTUALLY HAVE TO BE RAISED TO PAY FOR MY TWO TRILLION DOLLAR LIE!)
I hope the members of Congress enjoy their holiday break; I intend to enjoy mine. We have a great deal of work in the months ahead. Next year is an election year, but that does not relieve us of our responsibility to carry out the people's business. The American people did not elect us to govern in odd years (NOR ELECT ODD LEADERS TO GOVERN IN EVEN YEARS.)
They expect us to get things done. (LIKE SPYING ON THEM AND TAKING AWAY THEIR HABEUS CORPUS.)
And now I'll be glad to answer some of your questions, starting with AP man.
Q:
Mr. President, there's ambiguity in the statement that you have no recollection about the existence and destruction of the CIA interrogation tapes. Why can't you say yes or no about the tapes and their destruction? And regardless, do you think the destruction of the tapes was a responsible thing to do?
THE PRESIDENT:
It sounds pretty clear to me when I say I have -- the first recollection is when Mike Hayden briefed me. That's pretty clear (BUT CLARITY IS NOT NECESSARILY VERITY.)
Secondly, I am confident that the preliminary inquiry conducted by the AG and the IG of the CIA,
(I JUST LOVE THESE ACRONYMS!)
coupled with the oversight provided by the Congress (AND THANK GOODNESS THAT THEY SEE THAT ALL OF MY DEMANDS ARE MET OR ELSE) , will end up enabling us all to find out what exactly happened. And therefore, over the course of these inquiries and oversight hearings, I'm going to reserve judgment until I find out the full facts.
(SOUNDS A LITTLE BIT LIKE WHAT I SAID ABOUT THE VALERIE PLAME CASE, DOESN’T IT?)
I know I'm going to be asked about this question a lot as time goes on. I'm just going to prepare you; until these inquiries are complete, until the oversights are finished, then I will be rendering no opinion from the podium.
(OR FROM THE POOPDECK AND SLAUGHTERHOUSE)
Q:
Vladimir Putin has just been named Time Magazine's Person of the Year. And he has signaled that he intends to become prime minister. You said once that he had been wily about his intentions, but now that he's made those clear, what does it say about the state of democracy in
THE PRESIDENT:
You know, I'm looking forward to seeing him (AND LOOKING INTO HIS EYES AND SEEING HIS SOUL AGAIN) at the alumni meeting of the "men of the year," or the "persons of the year." I don't know when it's going to be, but -- look, I presume -- I haven't read the article, but I presume they put him on there because he was a consequential leader. And the fundamental question is, consequential to what end? What will the country look like 10 years from now?
(AND WHAT WILL
My hope, of course, is that
(AMERICA WRITES A LOT OF CHECKS BUT DOESN'T DO ENOUGH BALANCING), and free and fair elections (WITHOUT TAMPERING WITH VOTING MACHINES OR INTERVENTION BY A SUPREME COURT), and a vibrant press (THAT DOESN'T KOWTOW TO THE CORPORATE STATE OR RUBBER STAMP ANY HEAD OF STATE’S ACTIONS); that they understand Western values based upon human rights and human dignity are values that will lead to a better country (A COUNTRY THAT DOESN'T TORTURE).
That's my hopes.
(AND IN CORRECT English, THOSE ARE MY HOPES.)
Q:
Mr. President, a year ago when you had your year-end press conference, the Democrats had just taken control of Congress; they said that one of their main goals was to end the war in Iraq, they were talking a lot about very contentious times ahead. As you just said, the Congress has now passed again, without strings, money for the war, and you've achieved a lot of your goals and have gotten a lot of things you wanted from Congress, without a lot of give-and-take with them by talking tough with firm veto threats. What does this say about the Democratic leadership, the way they're running Congress and your relations with the leaders?
THE PRESIDENT:
You know, I don't view -- I just don't view life as zero-sum (OR ZERO-DUMB).
So there's plenty of credit to go around (AND PLENTY MORE CREDIT TO SPEND).
And we got a lot of priorities for next year. And one of my priorities -- this is -- I understand this is a bone of contention, but one of the priorities is to make sure they don't run up the taxes on people (ONLY SPEND, SPEND, SPEND LIKE THERE'S NO TOMORROW). And my attitude is, if you run them up on one area, it will become a habit that will be hard to break, and then they'll try to run them up on other areas. (LIKE MY CAMELS AND ARMADILLOS DO WHEN I LET 'EM RUN LOOSE AT CRAWFORD).
And the reason I feel strongly about that is I don't want to undermine the economy by raising taxes
(THE ONLY UNDERMINING I'LL DO IS TO CONTINUE INCREASING THE PENTAGON’S EXPENDITURES.
AIN'T CREDIT JUST GREAT?)
Q:
Mr. President, despite the military success of the surge, there's no evidence that one of its intended benefits, making it easier for the Iraqis to form a unity government, has had any effect. Refugees won't come home from
THE PRESIDENT:
Well, first of all, I don't agree with your premise that there's no politics taking place in
(ARE THE SEWERS FUNCTIONING? ARE THE GENERATORS PRODUCING ENOUGH ELECRICITY? IS THERE A FUNCTIONING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM?)
They did pass a budget last year, and they're in the process of passing their budget this year. I am pleased to report that there's been two readings of a de-Baathification law to the Council of Assemblies.
(I WONDER IF DE-BAATHIFICATION MEANS ONLY SHOWERS ARE ALLOWED?)
Q:
You've been in office for seven years now. You must have some pretty strong opinions about what it takes to sit in the Oval Office. What is important to you? Is experience in government important? Are a candidate's religious views important to you?
THE PRESIDENT:
What's important to me will be this: the principles by which people will make decisions.
(TAKE A MOMENT TO THINK ABOUT MY PRINCIPLES.)
And I would be very hesitant to support somebody who relied upon opinion polls and focus groups to define a way forward for a President.
(OR SUPPORT SOMEBODY WHO RELIED ON TAKING ORDERS FROM GOD TO DEFINE A WAY FORWARD...OH, I FORGET, THAT'S WHAT I’VE BEEN DOING.)
And secondly I would say, how do you intend to get advice from people you surround yourself -- who are you going to surround yourself with?
(WILL IT BE WITH LIARS AND SCAPEGOATS?)
Because whoever sits in that Oval Office is going to find this is a complex world, with a lot of issues coming into the Oval Office -- a lot -- and a great expectation in the world that the United States take the lead. And so my question would be, how do you intend to set up your Oval Office so that people will come in and give their advice?
(WHEN I'M AT THE RANCH I DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ALL OF THIS.)
Q:
It sounds like you think the principles are more important than experience or specific religious views.
THE PRESIDENT:
No, sometimes you develop your principles as a result of experience.
(AS I HAVE DONE.)
I just want to know whether or not somebody has got a sound set of principles from which they will not deviate as they make decisions that will affect the peace and security of our country
(MY OWN DEVIANT DECISIONS HAVE GREATLY AFFECTED THE PEACE AND SECURITY OF OUR COUNTRY AND THE WORLD.)
Q:
Thank you, Mr. President. Good morning.
You've announced a review of the situation in
THE PRESIDENT:
It is -- it makes sense for us to constantly review our strategies in a variety of theaters (SPEAKING OF THEATERS, HOW ABOUT THAT NEW MOVIE WITH WILL SMITH? GOTTA SEE THAT ONE.)
That's what -- that's what good governance is: You analyze the situation a year after the previous strategy to determine whether or not -- what worked and what didn't work
(AND YOU KEEP ANALYZING THE SITUATION YEAR AFTER YEAR UNTIL THE STRATEGY STARTS TO WORK; AND IF A STRATEGY DOESN’T WORK, YOU KEEP ANALYZING IT, YOU KEEP CATAPULTING THE PROPAGANDA.)
Now, it takes a while for societies that have been brutalized by tyranny and wracked by war to meet expectations. So the questions I ask on
(OR DEATH)
And of course, we press their governments to work to come together and get budgets passed, or in Iraq's case, de-Baathification law (TAKE THOSE SHOWERS!) or oil laws.
(MORE MONEY FOR OUR CORPORATIONS!)
And those are all important. But also what's important is the human condition
(LIKE THE CONDITION IN WHICH MILLIONS OF IRAQIS HAVE LEFT THEIR HOMES IN IRAQ AND THE HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS WHO HAVE DIED BECAUSE I WRACKED WAR UPON THEIR COUNTRY TO LIBERATE THEM FROM A BRUTAL TYRANNY).
Q:
Mr. President, thank you. If I could return a minute to the CIA tapes. I realize you don't want to discuss it at this point, but given your remarks about the struggle against ideology, how concerned are you that your administration once again faces criticism, questions from people around the world about the handling of a terrorist suspect?
THE PRESIDENT:
You know, you're trying to get me to prejudge the outcome of this inquiry. And let's wait and see what happens. Let's wait and see what the facts are. And -- look, we get criticized a lot for a variety of reasons. We're asking people to do hard things, for starters, which is intercept and find terrorists and to spread freedom
(NOT MANURE.)
And there's isolationist tendencies in this world.
(MY UNILATERAL PRE-EMPTIVE WAR IN
People would rather stay at home.
(OR STAY AT THE RANCH LIKE I DO.)
People would rather not aggressively pursue people overseas (AS I HAVE DONE), and aggressively pursue freedom.
I understand that. We got people like that in our own country.
(I GOT WORK MORE WORK TO DO ON MY GRAMMAR, TOO.)
And the fundamental question facing whoever sits in the Oval Office is, will you use the influence of the United States to advance a freedom agenda to help others realize the blessings of liberty and yield peace?
(OR USE BOMBS AND DEPLETED URANIUM WEAPONS TO ADVANCE THE DESTRUCTION OF THEIR COUNTRY AND CITIZENS?)
So I don't want people to get the wrong impression of our country. (EVEN THOUGH I HAVE GIVEN THEM ONE.)
Listen, thank you all. Have a wonderful holiday season. Appreciate it.
IT'S THE OIL STUPID!
From
My picks for the biggest assholes of 2007 by Bill Maher
Come on, no list of assholes and fuck-ups could be complete without the Dipshit in Chief. Who will tell this president what everyone but him already knows? The theory of evolution. And the times tables. And where the sun goes at night. And that Iraq is going to be three different countries. And that everyone hates us and we've run our military into the ground and the Taliban is back and we still haven't caught bin Laden and the economy is tanking and we wasted eight years blowing the oil companies while the Earth is melting. We had a pretty nice house when this Cat in the Hat of presidents came in and made the mess of all time. And who's going to clean it all up — Rudy Giuliani?
One candidate mentions the word change so much it sounds like a diaper commercial.
Another candidate believes the past tense form of the verb to see means something other than what the eyes do.
Truth is in the eyes of the beholder?
In addition to wearing
“In Jesus’ name, let me be your next president!”
We, the people, don’t want to vote for anyone to become the next president of the
We are tired of demagogues.
We are tired of rich liars who, in order to stay rich and obtain power, must obey and do what their corporate masters want them to do.
IT’S THE OIL STUPID!
John McCain is no longer singing:
Bomb, bomb Iran
Bomb, bomb
He's now singing:
Jingo-bells, Jingo-bells
All the way to Baghdad
It's basically the same tune.
War hero McCain is waving his Victory flag and singing the Jingoism jingle.
Bush lied and led America into Iraq, and McCain is willing to continue to carry out the Liar-in-Chief's disastrous and costly pre-emptive war.
The prominent propaganda now, to justify the occupation of Iraq, are the postive proclamations that conditions are improving in Iraq. As with everything...time will tell. But Professor Juan Cole wrote this:
The guerrilla movement in Iraq is generating a steady 600 attacks a week using bombs, small-arms, mortars and sniping. This number has not changed during the past six weeks, and although it is lower than the rate in September, it is a very significant number of attacks. Roadside bomb attacks in specific are down, but there is no change in the number of over-all attacks. The Iraqi government statistics show 600 civilian deaths a month (the US military's statistics are lower).
The US troop escalation that began last February seems to be implicated in the displacement of over one million Iraqis to Syria between March and October of this year, adding to the nearly 450,000 that fled there in 2006. This is according to projections from a United Nations weighted survey of nearly 800 refugees. Some 78% of those interviewed in Syria said that they came from Baghdad.
The United States military in Iraq has arrested and imprisoned 30,000 or so Iraqis, the majority of them Sunni Arabs. That is 0.1% of the entire Iraqi population! Marine Maj. Gen. Doug Stone says he fears that many of those detained are moderates or simply fought because they were paid to, and that holding so many of them together for very long may actually create more hardened terrorists.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Informed Comment
Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion
Patriotism is McCain's theme song for his race to the White House.
He, like Bush, is appealing to the fear factor:
Fear the Al-Qaeda terrorists even more even though there are fewer in Iraq;
Yes, the
America will stay there for a long, long time.
Those are my words, but they reflect Mr. McCain's ideas.
It is what George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and their followers have done to America in order to bomb Iraq that is their most despicable and damning CRIME, notwithstanding the causation and motivation of 9/11 itself.
Among all of the GOP presidential candidates, John McCain is now the number one cheerleader for the continuation of the occupation of
McCain wants to be the hero-savior sword-bearer of the Pentagon's geopolitical and national security interests in
McCain doesn't feel that it is a bad or wrong war, but only that it is a war that was waged badly.
If that isn't twisted logic I don't know what is.
But to say that the United States of America is jingoisic is to risk being called unpatriotic. Everybody has to keep singing that same tune, to the same beat...
Jingo Bells Iraq.
So keep those taxes coming in, America.
The war in
Jingo-bells
Jingo-bells
All the way to Baghdad...
Forever in
Obviously, I have to talk to you about the war in
Even so, the costs of retreat would be higher, fueling chaos in
John McCain
What Bush will almost surely be pushing for is permanent
If the dividing line between the two parties is that one backs Bush on Iraq and the other does not, the Republicans might as well give up the ghost and nominate Dick Cheney as their presidential standard-bearer. Bush's policy legacy, in short, poses a serious threat to what one presumes he wishes his political legacy to be -- a thriving Republican Party.
The president who waged a preemptive war now wants to lock in place a preemptive occupation. Only this time, instead of preempting a foreign nation, he is seeking to preempt Congress and his successor. It's the logical conclusion for his misshapen and miserable presidency, and I doubt the American people -- if they have any say in the matter -- will stand for it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Thursday,
Impeachment is the elephant in the room. Everyone knows that this country is being run by a criminal syndicate that has rigged elections, hidden its knowledge of the 9-11 attacks, lied the country into war, plotted to out an important CIA undercover operative and then obstruct a criminal investigation into that act, subverted most of the articles of the bill of rights, emasculated the Congress and the Courts (which it has also shamelessly packed with shameless hacks), betrayed veterans, surrendered a major American metropolis to the devastation of a hurricane, plotted to enable the declaring or martial law, tortured and kidnapped people in violation of international law and obstructed efforts to deal with the unprecedented crisis of global warming for an unconscionable seven years.
By DAVE LINDORFF
No rational person can deny that Iraq never had any connection whatsoever to the 9/11 attacks, especially given that none of the 9/11 attackers were even from Iraq. Yet, countless Iraqi people are now dead or maimed and their entire country is destroyed. One might easily say that Iraq is the federal massacre of Waco magnified a million-fold. The whole situation in Iraq brings to mind the famous dictum of Tacitus: "They made a desert and called it peace."
Nothing, not even "peace" in Iraq, will ever be able to morally justify a war of aggression against a nation whose people were totally innocent of the 9/11 attacks. Nothing, not even some warped definition of "terrorist," will ever be able to morally justify killing Iraqis who were doing nothing more than trying to oust their country of an illegal invader who had invaded with a thirst for vengeance and regime change relying on fake and false rationales for its invasion. Nothing will ever be able to morally justify the killing of even one single Iraqi, much less hundreds of thousands of them, given that neither the Iraqi people nor their government ever attacked the United States.
Neo-con supporters of the U.S. government's war of aggression against Iraq are undoubtedly holding their collective breath in the hope that U.S. military forces have finally smashed any further violent opposition to their conquest of Iraq. The attitude would then be, "You see, this shows that we were right after all to invade and occupy Iraq and kill and maim hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people."
Meanwhile, the Associated Press is reporting that U.S. soldiers have found mass graves next to a torture center north of Baghdad. In the torture center, chains were attached to blood-spattered walls while a metal bed was attached to an electrical shock system.
Where is Our Tacitus?
Nothing Can Morally Justify the Invasion of Iraq
By JACOB G. HORNBERGER
December 21, 2007
http://counterpunch.com/hornberger12212007.html
IT'S THE OIL STUPID!