Monday, March 17, 2008

THE SKY IS NOT FALLING BUT GLACIERS ARE RAPIDLY MELTING



The state of the world is in a sad shambles.
I know that every generation says the same thing about its own time.
The past seems less important than the present.
And the way we have been living indicates that the present is more important to us than our future.

I do not wish for the world to come to an end, but then I think to myself, "Well, maybe it's for the better. Maybe by starting over again things will turn out better."

Yeah, right.
This kind of nonsense has been repeated for centuries.

The serpent is forever devouring its tail.

The U.S. economy is in a slow-down.
A meltdown?
No, it's the world's glaciers that are doing that.

With regard to the economic inertia, we are told that the antidote is to spend, spend, spend.

Lower the interest rates.

Borrow, borrow, borrow!
Spend, spend, spend!

People are making less money than they were (except for the super-rich);
companies are making less money than they were (except for the oil companies);
the dollar has less value;
our nation produces less than it consumes...
Does it logically follow that we should spend more and more?

Isn't this why the glaciers are melting?
Isn't this why wars are being (and have been) fought?

We are over-consuming and over-using...
TOO MUCH.

Start over?

It must be that time again for a new and bigger...
WAR.

Mad Plato


IT'S THE OIL STUPID!

**********************************

AND THIS from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7299561.stm

About the versions
BBC News
watch One-Minute World News
mobiles News services
Your news when you want it


Last Updated: Sunday, 16 March 2008, 19:51 GMT
Glaciers suffer record shrinkage
Glacier. Image: Glaciers Online/Jurg Alean
Some glaciers in Europe have suffered significant losses

The rate at which some of the world's glaciers are melting has more than doubled, data from the United Nations Environment Programme has shown.

Average glacial shrinkage has risen from 30 centimetres per year between 1980 and 1999, to 1.5 metres in 2006.

Some of the biggest losses have occurred in the Alps and Pyrenees mountain ranges in Europe.

Experts have called for "immediate action" to reverse the trend, which is seen as a key climate change indicator.

Estimates for 2006 indicate shrinkage of 1.4 metres of 'water equivalent' compared to half a metre in 2005.

Achim Steiner, Under-Secretary General of the UN and executive director of its environment programme (UNEP), said: "Millions if not billions of people depend directly or indirectly on these natural water storage facilities for drinking water, agriculture, industry and power generation during key parts of the year.

"There are many canaries emerging in the climate change coal mine. The glaciers are perhaps among those making the most noise and it is absolutely essential that everyone sits up and takes notice.

Litmus test

He said that action was already being taken and pointed out that the elements of a green economy were emerging from the more the money invested in renewable energies.

Mr Steiner went on: "The litmus test will come in late 2009 at the climate convention meeting in Copenhagen.

"Here governments must agree on a decisive new emissions reduction and adaptation-focused regime. Otherwise, and like the glaciers, our room for manoeuvre and the opportunity to act may simply melt away."

Dr Ian Willis, of the Scott Polar Research Institute, said: "It is not too late to stop the shrinkage of these ice sheets but we need to take action immediately."

The findings were compiled by the World Glacier Monitoring Service which is supported by UNEP. Thickening and thinning is calculated in terms of 'water equivalent'.

Glaciers across nine mountain ranges were analysed.

Triftgletscher glacier in Switzerland   Image: Glaciers Online/Jurg Alean
Glaciers have been monitored for more than a century

Dr. Wilfried Haeberli, director of the service, said: "The latest figures are part of what appears to be an accelerating trend with no apparent end in sight.

"This continues the trend in accelerated ice loss during the past two and a half decades and brings the total loss since 1980 to more than 10.5 metres of water equivalent."

During 1980-1999, average loss rates had been 0.3 metres per year. Since the turn of the millennium, this rate had increased to about half a metre per year.

The record annual loss during these two decades - 0.7 metres in 1998 - has now been exceeded by three out of the past six year (2003, 2004 and 2006).

On average, one metre water equivalent corresponds to 1.1 metres in ice thickness. That suggests a further shrinking in 2006 of 1.5 actual metres and since 1980 a total reduction in thickness of ice of just over 11.5 metres or almost 38 feet.

In its entirety, the research includes figures from around 100 glaciers, with data showing significant shrinkage taking place in European countries including Austria, Norway, Sweden, Italy, Spain and Switzerland.

Norway's Breidalblikkbrea glacier thinned by almost 3.1 metres in one of the largest reductions.



VIDEO AND AUDIO NEWS
A rapidly shrinking Norwegian glacier



SEE ALSO
Antarctic glaciers show retreat
21 Apr 05 Science/Nature
Arctic dips as global waters rise
15 Jun 06 Science/Nature
Melting of glaciers 'speeds up'
29 Jan 07 Science/Nature

News feeds News feeds



  • MMVIII

  • Most Popular Now The most read story in Europe is: On holiday in North Korea
  • Back to top ^^
AmericasAfricaEuropeMiddle EastSouth AsiaAsia Pacific




Saturday, March 15, 2008

UNHAPPY NAMES



How Many Child Prostitutes Is Bush Responsible for?By Bob Fertik

An estimated 50,000 prostitutes, some as young as 13, are among the 1.2 million Iraqis who fled to Syria after Bush invaded.
George Bush has been tied to a prostitution ring involving as many as 50,000 women and girls. The prostitutes, some as young as 13, are among the 1.2 million desperate Iraqis who fled to Syria after Bush's invasion of Iraq in 2003, according to the U.K. Independent.
Bush's invasion destroyed the Iraqi government and unleashed a wave of political and sectarian violence that has killed over 1 million Iraqis and forced 4 million to become refugees, according to the UN.
Facing starvation, as many as 50,000 women and girls have been forced into prostitution in Syria alone, according to Hana Ibrahim of the Women's Will Association.
"70 percent to 80 percent of the girls working this business in Damascus today are Iraqis," 23-year-old Abeer told the New York Times. "The rents here in Syria are too expensive for their families. If they go back to Iraq they'll be slaughtered, and this is the only work available."
According to the Times, "inexpensive Iraqi prostitutes have helped to make Syria a popular destination for sex tourists from wealthier countries in the Middle East. In the club's parking lot, nearly half of the cars had Saudi license plates."
Driving women and girls into prostitution violates numerous human rights agreements, including the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children. George Bush himself denounced sex trafficking at the United Nations in 2003.
Bush's invasion of a country that posed no threat to the U.S. was illegal under both U.S. and international law, according to legal experts. Bush has been convicted of war crimes by citizen tribunals around the world, including New York, Paris, Tokyo, and Istanbul. Just las week, the towns of Brattleboro and Marlboro Vermont voted to indict and arrest Bush and Cheney.
In 2002 and 2003, Bush led a propaganda campaign to defraud Congress, the American people, and key allies into believing Iraq was a threat. Bush claimed Iraq had stockpiles of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons to use against the U.S., and was sharing them with Al Qaeda.
Speaking near Rochester NY, Bush later admitted, "See in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda."
According to a recent study by the Center for Public Integrity, top Bush Administration officials told at least 935 lies about Iraq on 532 separate occasions. These included 259 lies by Bush, 254 lies by Secretary of State Colin Powell, 109 lies by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, 109 lies by Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, 56 lies by National Security Advisor Condi Rice, and 48 lies by Vice President Cheney.
The lies about Iraqi WMD's were manufactured by the White House Iraq Group (WHIG), which included the most senior White House staff: White House Chief of Staff Andy Card, Condi Rice, Stephen Hadley, Karen Hughes, Mary Matalin, Jim Wilkinson, Nick Calio, Michael Gerson, and Vice President Cheney's Chief of Staff, Scooter Libby.







Our neo-totalitarians are planning new wars in the Middle East, Far East, Conga Line!
While his latest State of the Union speech justifies eavesdropping (without judicial warrants) on anybody in the United States that he wants to listen in on.
This is what we call dictatorship.
Dictatorship. Dictatorship.
And it is time we objected before he shoves us into World War Three.
Can we wait till the next election?
Only if the electronic voting machinery has paper trails or, perhaps, honest old-fashioned paper ballots.
In any case, with one voice let us say, “We’ve had enough of you. Go home to Crawford.
We’ll help you raise the money for a library, and you won’t ever have to read a book.
We the folks are not cruel even though we must now echo America’s spiritual ancestor Oliver Cromwell, in his order to the infamous Long Parliament:
‘You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing lately… Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. And so, in the name of that God who created the whale—Go!’”

Gore Vidal

************************************************************************




One or more words can become a lasting label and imprint upon memory.

Names that we would like to forget, but which cannot be forgotten because they are unforgettable.

Names that cause mind and body to shudder.

Hitler.

Pearl Harbor.

Hiroshima.

Nagasaki.
WACO.

9-11.

SHOCK AND AWE.

IRAQ.


Wednesday, March 19, marks five years since George W. Bush decided to shock and awe the world with his concocted and perfidious war.

Many eons after Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Bush are laid to rest, Iraq will still be radioactive.

The heart of darkness that Decider George W. Bush left in Iraq will remain a perennial radioactive nightmare.

A smiling, smirking, and dancing George W. Bush looks as dumb as an ox and harmless as a flea.

Murderers are not always monsters.
Mad Plato

************************************************************************




The three days and nights Jonah spent in the belly of a nauseous whale must have seemed like a serious jinx to the digestion-challenged mammal who extruded him much as the decent opinion of mankind has done to Bush.

One can see former President Jonah in his sumptuous presidential library happily catering to faith-based fans with animated scriptures rooted in “The Pet Goat.”

Not since the glory days of Watergate and Nixon’s Luciferian fall has there been so much written about the dogged deceits and creative criminalities of our rulers. We have also come to a point in this dark age where there is not only no hero in view but no alternative road unblocked. We are trapped terribly in a now that few foresaw and even fewer can define.

Under the ‘boy emperor’ George W. Bush (as Chalmers Johnson refers to him), we have entered the Dark Ages in earnest, pursuing a short-sighted path that can only accelerate our decline. For what we are now seeing are the obvious characteristics of the West after the fall of Rome: the triumph of religion over reason; the atrophy of education and critical thinking; the integration of religion, the state, and the apparatus of torture—a troika that was for Voltaire the central horror of the pre-Enlightenment world; as well as, today, the political and economic marginalization of our culture.... The British historian Charles Freeman published an extended discussion of the transition that took place during the late Roman empire, the title of which could serve as a capsule summary of our current rulers: ”The Closing of the Western Mind.”

Close observers of this odd presidency note that Bush, like his evangelical base, believes he is on a mission from God and that faith trumps empirical evidence.

We shouldn’t be surprised at the antipathy toward democracy displayed by the Bush administration. ... As already noted, fundamentalism and democracy are completely antithetical. The opposite of the Enlightenment, of course, is tribalism, groupthink; and more and more, this is the direction in which the United States is going. ... Anthony Lewis who worked as a columnist for the New York Times for thirty-two years, observes that what has happened in the wake of 9/11 is not just the threatening of the rights of a few detainees, but the undermining of the very foundation of democracy. Detention without trial, denial of access to attorneys, years of interrogation in isolation—these are now standard American practice, and most Americans don’t care. Nor did they care about the revelation in July 2004 (reported in Newsweek), that for several months the White House and the Department of Justice had been discussing the feasibility of canceling the upcoming presidential election in the event of a possible terrorist attack.” I suspect that the technologically inclined prevailed against that extreme measure on the ground that the newly installed electronic ballot machines could be so calibrated that Bush’s heirs would win handily no matter what (read Rep. Conyers’ report (.pdf file) on the rigging of Ohio’s vote).

Meanwhile, the indoctrination of the people merrily continues. “In a ’State of the First Amendment Survey‘ conducted by the University of Connecticut in 2003, 34 percent of Americans polled said the First Amendment ‘goes too far’; 46 percent said there was too much freedom of the press; 28 percent felt that newspapers should not be able to publish articles without prior approval of the government; 31 percent wanted public protest of a war to be outlawed during that war; and 50 percent thought the government should have the right to infringe on the religious freedom of ‘certain religious groups’ in the name of the war on terror.”

Now that George W. Bush has been caught illegally wiretapping fellow citizens he has taken to snarling about his powers as “a wartime president,” and so, in his own mind, he is above each and every law of the land. Oddly, no one in Congress has pointed out that he may well be a lunatic dreaming that he is another Lincoln but whatever he is or is not he is no wartime president. There is no war with any other nation...yet. There is no state called terror, an abstract noun like liar. Certainly his illegal unilateral ravaging of Iraq may well seem like a real war for those on both sides unlucky enough to be killed or maimed, but that does not make it a war any more than the appearance of having been elected twice to the presidency does not mean that in due course he was: in due course, our befuddled people will demand an investigation of those two irregular processes. Although he has done a number of things that under the old republic might have got him impeached, our current system protects him: incumbency-for-life seats have made it possible for a Republican majority in the House not to do its duty and impeach him for his incompetence in handling, say, the natural disaster that befell Louisiana and then the U.S. military itself.

Gore Vidal


IT'S THE OIL STUPID!






Friday, March 14, 2008

READING BETWEEN THE BUCKS


March 14, 2008

President Bush Visits the Economic Club of New York
New York
Hilton
New York, New York

[NOTE: THIS IS IN VERY ABRIDGED FORM]

THE PRESIDENT:

Thanks for giving me a chance to speak to the Economic Club of New York.

We inherited a recession.

[AND YOU WILL INHERIT MY 3,000,000,000,000 WAR]

And then there was the attacks of September the 11th, 2001

[I’M STILL HAVING TROUBLE USING MY TO BE VERBS; AND YOU PROBABLY DIDN’T REALIZE THAT A MONTH LIKE SEPTEMBER CAN ATTACK]

And then we had corporate scandals. And I made the difficult decisions to confront the terrorists and extremists in two major fronts, Afghanistan and Iraq.

[THE OPERATIVE WORD IS FRONT FOR ALL OF YOU CONSPIRACY THEORISTS]

And then we had devastating natural disasters

[THAT SOME SAY I MAY HAVE HELPED ENGENDER SINCE I EVISCERATED

MOST OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDS THAT WERE IN PLACE BEFORE MY ADMINISTRATION]

A lot of folks are waiting to see what Congress intends to do. One thing that's certain that Congress will do is waste some of your money.

[LIKE I HAVE IN IRAQ. I GUESS LIFE DOES IMITATE ART]

Thank you for your time.

(Applause.)


IT'S THE OIL STUPID!

Thursday, March 13, 2008

KENNINGS

I am fortunate to be a teacher.

My subject chose me more than I chose it.

English.

"Oh, that was my worst subject", or "Oh, that was my favorite subject", are two typical replies I get when I tell strangers that I'm an English teacher.

Should there be a comma after that last quote? Which is correct...quote or quotation?

This is the why others feel uneasy around English teachers.

Biology and science were my favorite subjects in high school.

But a substitute that I had for my 10th grade English class lit the light of my interest in poetry.

It was the poem Childe Harold's Pilgrimage by Lord Byron and some poems by Wallace Stevens that did the trick.

I received A's in my high school chemistry class, not because of high test scores, but because of my humorous lab reports.

I learned to write in Chemistry class.

Thank you Mr. McDougal for letting me be zany and creative!

My Honors' courses at the University of Colorado introduced me to Plato, Camus, Baudlaire, Rimbaud, Kazantzakis...others.

From these authors I began reading the words of other Great writers and thinkers.

But this is not what I'm really writing about here.

My subject is kennings.

As an English teacher and poet, I teach and use

Figurative language in my own writing.

It is not always an easy thing to do.

My ninth-grade classes just finished reading Romeo and Juliet.

Yes, both movies were shown (I only show the 1968 Franco Zeffirelli version with Leonard Whiting and Olivia Hussey; and the 1996 film with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes.)

I ambushed my students with armies of similes and metaphors.

There were only a few examples of personification and alliteration;

But battalions of puns and oxymorons!

But what are kennings?

Here are some definitions:

Poetic synonyms.

In literature, a kenning is a magic poetic phrase, a figure of speech, substituted for the usual name of a person or thing. Kennings work much the same way as epithets and verbal formulae, and were commonly inserted into Old English poetic lines.

A short metaphorical description of a thing used in place of the thing’s name.

A new noun or noun phrase replaces a more familiar noun.

The word kenning is derived from the Old Norse phrase kenna ett vid, which means “to express a thing in terms of another”, and is found throughout Norse, Anglo-Saxon and Celtic literature.

Here are some examples:

Beowulf=bee-wolf=bear

gold=tears

raven harvest=corpse

valley trout=serpent

flame-farewelled and sleep of the sword=death

wave’s steed or sea steed=ship

sun of the houses=fire

battle icicle=sword

din of spears or spear crash=battle

sky-candle=sun

wound-sea, slaughter-dew, or battle-sweat=blood

breaker of trees=wind

spear of the hair=comb

swan road=river

skull-splitter=axe

weather of weapons=war

brow-stars=eyes

sea-garment=sail

winter garment=snow

seabird’s bath=sea

Here are few of my own banal kennings:

hair-divider=comb

time machine=clock

word-maker=pen

noise-maker=mouth

If I come up with some others I’ll let you know.

I tried.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

NO MORE FALLON BUT A FELON IS KNOCKING AGAIN AT THE GATES OF HELL





I expect that there will be no war (with Iran), and that is what we ought to be working for. We ought to try to do our utmost to create different conditions.
Admiral William J. Fallon



Just as Fallon took over Centcom last spring, the White House was putting itself on a war footing with Iran. Almost instantly, Fallon began to calmly push back against what he saw as an ill-advised action. Over the course of 2007, Fallon's statements in the press grew increasingly dismissive of the possibility of war, creating serious friction with the White House.
Last December, when the National Intelligence Estimate downgraded the immediate nuclear threat from Iran, it seemed as if Fallon's caution was justified. But still, well-placed observers now say that it will come as no surprise if Fallon is relieved of his command before his time is up next spring, maybe as early as this summer, in favor of a commander the White House considers to be more pliable. If that were to happen, it may well mean that the president and vice-president intend to take military action against Iran before the end of this year and don't want a commander standing in their way.
Thomas P.M. Barnett
[Former Naval War College professor]





Prosecute a politican and a prostitute to take attention away from a war with...
Iran!

That's the ticket.

Shakespeare's pen would have a field day with the intrigues and machinations of the
Gray
House
of
Bush.

An iron curtain of censorship prevents the public from knowing all of this.

I suppose it has always been the case in any country's central government.

Whether it be England, Spain, France, Germany, Russia etc.

The geopolitical chess boards have players and moves that do not see the light of day in sound-proof basements of secrecy.

I do not wish for there to be any more war.

I believe that diplomacy would achieve much more than more war would.

Fallon, who did not want to talk about war with Iran, nor be a part of its planning, did not just leave gently into the night.

Bush's Neo Con masters made the Decider
GET
RID
OF
Fallon.

(Or maybe it is now only Bush's own brain...
but the "MASTERS" are pleased nonetheless)


No wussies!

No pacifists!

ONLY FIGHTERS TO THE DEATH FOR THE STATE'S CORPORATE MASTERS!

GOTTA
GIVE
THE OWNERS
OF
AMERICA
AND
ISRAEL
ANOTHER
HORSE
SHOT
IN THE ARM!

Israel's airstrike deep in Syria last October was reported to have targeted a nuclear-related facility, but details have remained sketchy and some experts have been skeptical that Syria had a covert nuclear program. An alternative scenario floating in Israel and Lebanon is that the real purpose of the strike was to force Syria to switch on the targeting electronics for newly received Russian anti-aircraft defenses. The location of the strike is seen as on a likely flight path to Iran (also crossing the friendly Kurdish-controlled Northern Iraq), and knowing the electronic signatures of the defensive systems is necessary to reduce the risks for warplanes heading to targets in Iran.
Two U.S. warships took up positions off Lebanon earlier this month, replacing the USS Cole. The deployment was said to signal U.S. concern over the political stalemate in Lebanon and the influence of Syria in that country. But the United States also would want its warships in the eastern Mediterranean in the event of military action against Iran to keep Iranian ally Syria in check and to help provide air cover to Israel against Iranian missile reprisals. One of the newly deployed ships, the USS Ross, is an Aegis guided missile destroyer, a top system for defense against air attacks.
["From Are We Closer to War?" By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Wednesday, March 12, 2008]



P.S.
Today I received James Thurber's The Last Flower
A Parable in Pictures.
On the bottom of the front cover are these words:
"A melancholy argument against annihilation. The Last Flower is on the short list of books worth clutching to your chest as the world is destroyed."
---David Rees, author of Get Your War On


IT'S THE OIL STUPID!

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

COGITATIONS

When there is not much of interest on the Net, I start thinking about what to write about.

George W. Bush is always somewhere among cogitations within my think box.

I was wondering today how to write about Bush, Wars and Whores.

I know the juxtaposition of these words is not a kind one, but the Long War Decider has done some unkindly things.

Lately, though, if he's not dancing like a fool, he's telling jokes (or attempting to) about the fallen minions of his mendacious and monstrous administration.

A man who visited a prostitute does not seem as uncivil or evil as a man who defiled and deserted the Constitution of the United States.

That Goddamned piece of paper (the Decider's words) that is a thorn in Bush's unitary craw that he signs away with his signing statements.

The world's future generations will be shocked and in awe at how little was done by Americans to expel a president who repeatedly lied and laughed at them.

Monday, March 10, 2008

DREAMING

Last night I dreamed all night that I was moving to David Letterman's house in New York.
I have no idea why.
I have no idea where Mr. Letterman's house is, nor what it looks like.
But my dream didn't seem to care.
When I am dreaming, if I get up to go the bathroom or the kitchen, and then go back to sleep, I don't usually step back into the same dream.
I never did make it to Mr. Letterman's house, and maybe that is why the dream continued after each bathroom or kitchen "break".
Dreaming is a very strange phenomenon.
I'll let everyone know if tonight's or tomorrow's dream is me still trying to get to David Letterman's house.
My bags are packed just in case.


IT'S THE OIL STUPID!

Sunday, March 09, 2008

A PRESIDENT WHO HAS GONE OVERBOARD



GWB: You see, I like waterboarding. I used to ski on my board every summer. It's fun and relaxing to waterboard.
REPORTER: But Mr. President, what about torture?
GWB: Didn't need no torch. I did my waterboarding during the day.


IT'S THE OIL STUPID!



Published: March 9, 2008
New York Times

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Saturday further cemented his legacy of fighting for strong executive powers, using his veto to shut down a Congressional effort to limit the Central Intelligence Agency’s latitude to subject terrorism suspects to harsh interrogation techniques.

The Senate’s majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, said Mr. Bush disregarded the advice of military commanders, including Gen. David H. Petraeus, who argued that the military’s interrogation techniques were effective and that the use of any others could create risks for any future American prisoners of war.

“He has rejected the Army field manual’s recognition that such horrific tactics elicit unreliable information, put U.S. troops at risk and undermine our counterinsurgency efforts,” Mr. Reid said in a statement. Democrats vowed to raise the matter again.

Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has been an outspoken opponent of torture, often referring to his own experience as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. In this case he supported the administration’s position, arguing as Mr. Bush did Saturday that the legislation would have limited the C.I.A.’s ability to gather intelligence.

Senator John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, disputed that assertion on Saturday. “As chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I have heard nothing to suggest that information obtained from enhanced interrogation techniques has prevented an imminent terrorist attack,” he said in a statement.

Representative Bill Delahunt, a Democrat from Massachusetts, has been holding hearings on the administration’s negotiations with Iraq over the legal status of American troops in Iraq beyond Mr. Bush’s presidency. He said the administration had rebuffed demands to bring any agreement to Congress for approval, and had largely succeeded.

“They’re excellent at manipulating the arguments so that if Congress should assert itself, members expose themselves to charges of being soft, not tough enough on terrorism,” he said. “My view is history is going to judge us all.”