Friday, July 10, 2009

DOLPHINS WHALES APES AND MEN










Not
From Tall Trees Did We Descend
But From Deep Seas Around The Earth
Did we have our Birth and End.


By M.L. Squier



I just penned---or rather typed---these lines because I have been thinking about some intriguing ideas in a book called Water and Sexuality (an intriguing title in itself) by Michel Odent.

Last year in one of my English classes an idea surfaced (as so many do).

The subject was evolution.

Human evolution.

Did humans really "come from" Chimpanzees and Monkeys...

Or might they have "come from" Dolphins and Whales?

To whom are humans most closely related?

No answers have been definitively given, but below are some intriguing thoughts that I found in Water and Sexuality.



***



"For many thousands of years the countless philosophers and scholars who pronounced on human nature did so without seeing that man is first an aquatic primate. The time has come for a radically new vision of man."

"To the voices of those who wonder whether man is destined to return to the sea, one can add the voices putting this question the other way round: was man more acquatic in the past? Might it not have been in the sea that man learned to stand up? Might it not have possible that the direct ancestor of man, the missing link, was a primate spending some of its life in water?"

"There are one hundred and niney-three living species of monkeys and apes. One hundred and ninety-two of them are covered with hair. The exception is a naked ape self-named Homo sapiens."

"With his layer of fat under the skin, man is an exception among the primates. Apes also have some fat; however, it is not under the skin but mostly around the internal organs of the abdomen. This fat's only function is to serve as an energy reserve."
"On the other hand, a layer of subcutaneous fat is common to all mammals that are adapted to water. This layer of fat protects them against the cold. It also makes them more buoyant. Their bodies are streamlined, more 'aquadynamic'. This characteristic of human beings appears at a very early age. Compared with the chubby human baby, the baby ape is thin and bony."
"When you look at the human being as a primate adapted to water, the meaning of nakedness and subcutaneous fat ceases to be mysterious. The skin and subcutaneous fat of the Hippopotamus amphibius together weigh 450 kg!"

"Generally speaking, whether in an upright or horizontal position, the spine of sea mammals is aligned with hind limbs. Here is an essential point in common between humans and cetaceans. Adaptation to water goes with great flexibility of the spine, which is another point in common between humans and cetaceans. Thanks to the great flexibility of the spine, some humans can cover a distance of a hundred metres in less than a minute by swimming in a butterfly style, using the legs in a dolphin-like kick. There is no example of an ape that can bend backwards."

"Once more, what makes man an exception among the primates is the rule among cetaceans. From the many descriptions of sea mammals mating, it seems that always happens face to face, with exception of seals and sea-lions when they are on the shore."

"Man is the only primate who floods his eyes to express certain feelings. Although a chimpanzee can express a wide range of emotions, you'll never see a tear in his eye."

"There are several skin disorders that occur only in humans. Examples of these are acne, seborrhoea and sebaceous cysts."
"Overactivity of the sebaceous glands is so common among adolescents that it could be considered as a normal stage in the development of human skin. What is this process all about? Why have we this ability to cover our skin with a thin film of fat? Is it evidence of adaptation to water? One might add this fact to the property fish oils have to reduce the permeability of skin to water."

"...although whales and dolphins belong to an order of mammals very distant to primates, they share with man a huge cerebral development, which is apparently of the same scale. One could even put forward the claim that the degree of encephalization of the dolphin is greater than that of man, if you just compare weight and size. It is worth noting that 95.9 per cent of the human brain is covered by the neocortex, whereas it covers 97.8 per cent of the dolphin's brain."

"It has been calculated that the dolphin can receive at least ten times more information through its sense organs than we can. But the dolphin does not have hands, and the hand can be considered a true sensory organ, with it immense zone of projection on the brain."
"Despite all this, the greatest part of the cortex in the dolphin, just as in man, has much more to do than simply to analyse the information given to it by the sensory organs. It is as if, set free from practical worries, humans and dolphins have time to think."

"How has it been possible, for so many thousands of years, that countless philosophers and scholars, who were pronouncing on human nature, did so without seeing that Homo sapiens is above all Homo aquaticus?

"The point is that even with the current technological advances, fossil specialists cannot build one single satisfactory theory of the genesis of man. There is a blank of several million years to fill."

"The belief that water was the beginning of all things persisted in the teaching of Thales of Miletus, whose philosophy marks the transition in Western thought from mythical forms to scientific speculations about the origins of the world."
"The probability that the sea covered a part of East Africa for a period might be a key for comprehending the emergence of man; it may also be a root of cross-cultural myths and legends. It adds support to the growing conviction among evolutionists that the emergence of man was accomplished more rapidly than was once imagined. It adds powerful support to the theories of Alister Hardy. And it makes us think twice about the limitations of an approach that is based exclusively on fossils. What are the chances of finding fossils that can be used by scientists? This difficulty is not insurmountable. Some whales are known only by their fossils. La Lumiere noticed that most hominid remains have been found in rocks that seem to have been formed in lakes and estuaries."

Was Humanity Born in the Water?
"We have seen that most of the features that distinguish man from the apes can be interpreted as signs of adaptation to an aquatic environment. We have drawn attention to the fact that the missing link probably corresponds to the time when part of the African continent was covered by sea. But there is still one stage to be considered before the aquatic theory can be accepted as a serious basis for reflection and study. This stage is a toing and froing between land and sea, which is a well-known and common phenomenon in the process of evolution."
"Going back to the sea is an ordinary evolutionary process, involving birds such as penguins and reptiles such as crocodiles and snakes. When one thinks of the mammals who returned to the sea, cetaceans such as whales, dolphins and porpoises come first to mind. Like all mammals, they are warm-blooded animals; they breathe air, develop in the uterus before birth, and go through a period of breast-feeding. It is generally agreed that these mammals started to go back to the sea about seventy millions years ago, and that they derive from two or three different terrestrial species."
"It is important to realize that every known order of mammal has cousins in the water. The dugong and the manatee are the descendants of vegetarian hoofed animals; seals, sea-lions and walruses are the descendants of carnivorous animals; beavers are the cousins of purely terrestrial rodents. So why is ti impossible that a primate temporarily followed the same route? This primate is man."

"The skeleton of an extinct variety of aquatic primate, the Oreopithecus, has been found in Italy. The bones were preserved because they sank into the mud. This primate, adapted to life in the swamp, had many points in common with man, such as the short, broad pelvis and the elbow of an upright walker, as well as a flattened face."

"Since the passage between sea and land is possible in both directions, and since some animal species are amphibious, there is no a priori reason why certain mammals adapted to water should not go back to dry land. This might have been so in the case of the elephant. The elephant has many things in common with aquatic mammals. It has practically no hair and has webbing between its toes. The opening in the skin for nostrils is above the eyes, as in sea mammals (in the elephant this is hidden because the air canal continues down inside the trunk). The elephant is an excellent swimmer and expresses emotions by shedding tears. At the birth of the baby elephant, there is always an 'aunt': an experienced female that plays the role of the midwife. The presence of a midwife might be a point in common between sea mammals, elephants and humans."

Towards the Ocean
"The authentic Homo sapiens will turn more and more towards the water, the sea, the ocean. He will look to the element as a feminine symbol---water as a symbol and sexuality cannot be dissociated---and this will help him to become reintegrated into nature."
"He will also turn his attention towards the water in the search for new sources of energy. He will be inspired by the process of photosynthesis that plants have used for billions of years. He will try to meet the challenge of solar hydrogen, and split water into hydrogen and oxygen by electrolysis. Water might become the fuel of the future. And if one day we learn how to fuse the nuclei of two types of hydrogen, it will be another chapter in the story of hydrogen, which is a component part of water."
"Man will turn also towards the ocean to bring to an end the burning of the planet. He will learn to master the infinite energy oceans can offer to man. Can he do that without making the ocean a new colony? Can he do that and maintain an ocean as a respected universe?"

"The ocean provides Homo sapiens with a focus for the rediscovery of the central metaphor of an old and forgotten wisdom. It is the vision of the ocean where every wave, apparently distinct, is intrinsic to the whole. Every being is a temporary and fleeting form that is absorbed in an amorphous and unlimited whole."
'The sage who wants to change the world will have to look towards the water,' said the Taoist Tchouang-Tsu. The sage who wants to change the world must look at the new-born baby. 'Civilization will commence on the day when the well-being of the new-born baby prevails over any other consideration,' said Wilhelm Reich. Let us combine these two prophecies at a time when the advent of an authentic Homo sapiens is the only chance for the planet to survive. May such wisdom, such sapience, be the prime accomplishment of man."

***


The following is a commentary on the human-dolphin connection involving little known facts. As the result of scientific research, it is becoming more convincing that dophins are the "other humans" that share the planet with us.

Seem like a far-fetched idea? Many of the commonly accepted world views of today were not so common nor accepted at one time. A shift in world opinion first begins with the first few pioneers who bravely introduce a new thought that often meets with great resistance and disbelief ...at first.

The ancestral connections between dolphins and humans is based on continuing research and other convincing evidence. You may find it quite thought provoking.


DOLPHIN-HUMAN-APE
by Paula Peterson
Earthcode International Network

The aquatic ape theory was first put forward by Alister Hardy, research scientist and Professor of Zoology, Oxford University, back in 1960.

Hardy suggested that many of the characteristics that make humans so very different than the apes can be accounted for if humankind passed through a semi-aquatic phase a very long time ago.

An increasing number of anthropologists and other scientists are considering the aquatic ape theory more seriously.

Our aquatic phase is theorized to have taken place between nine and three million years ago, at a time which corresponds with the emergence of the dolphin of today.

Mounting evidence suggests that human's are more closely related to dolphins, far more than they are related to apes. Some of you may be laughing and scoffing right now. However, if you've studied the latest scientific research, you would be impressed.

Continuing research increasingly supports that humans, dolphins, and apes evolved from a common ancestor.

Why hasn't any of this research been made more public? Obviously, it clashes with the versions set down by academic institutions throughout the world: humans evolved from the apes - and few have challenged it. Darwin did a good job of convincing us, and largely, his theories laid the foundation for all subsequent research studies involving human origin. Studies on human-ape correlation seem endless.

There are fewer studies comparing humans and cetaceans (dolphins and whales). These studies have been restricted to the similarities of the brain, especially the neocortex. In this regard the cetacean brain is nearly identical, and may even be superior to the human brain according to the latest research. But there are many more similarities as follows.

Research into the skeletal structure of Cetaceans shows vestiges of toes (fingers?) and dewclaws (thumbs?). These evolved into powerful flippers and tails, indicating that dolphins and whales once lived on the land. But that research is pretty common knowledge these days.

What are lesser known, and far more interesting characteristics, are those that point to some fascinating connections with humans. In the works of theorist Sir Alister Hardy, award-winning writer Elaine Morgan, and in the studies of Dr. Michel Odent---world famous surgeon and pioneer into human water births - dolphins, humans and apes are likely to have evolved from a common ancestor millions of years ago.
One of the most noticeable differences between human and ape is the lack of hair. Humans do, indeed, have hairs all over the body. However, the hairs are short, fine and less conspicuous. The argument for this difference is that our early ancestors had to stay cool from the heat of the Savanna deserts where early humans are said to have first appeared. But that makes no sense. Even in the hottest countries, apes and other animals still have hair. In fact, the hair provides insulation and protection from heat as well as the suns rays.

And why did the hunting male, who was likely to over heat in the course of the hunt, retain more hair than the slower-moving female waiting back home?

Aquatic ape theory points out that virtually all hairless mammals are either aquatic or wallowers. The longer an animal has been in the water, the more complete the hair loss. Dolphins still retain a few vestigial bristles around their snout, but otherwise, their silken skin is entirely naked.

The only ocean mammals that have fur are those who get out of the water to spend time on land in cold climates such as seals or otters. It's interesting that human's have most of the hair on their heads, which is the part of the body that is above water while swimming. The aquatic ape theory suggests that humans kept the hair on their heads for protection and to give their offspring something to hang onto while the parent spent time wallowing in the water.

Having no hair on the body makes human skin very sensitive and pleasurable to touch. Lack of body hair, sensitive skin, and sensuality is a common trait humans share with dolphins and other cetaceans.

Male apes mount the female only from behind during copulation. The most frequent position during copulating humans is face to face. The only position of copulation for dolphins is face to face. Dolphins, like humans, have sex even when they are not in heat which is unusual in the animal kingdom.

It has been hypothesized that the larger brain and expanded neocortex - which is a common trait shared between humans, dolphins and whales - is correlated with increased sexual activity which is unconnected with reproductive goals. Homosexual contact is common among dolphins and is rarely found elsewhere among animals (although there are studies in which this behavior has been observed in other animal species).

There is a fatty layer beneath the skin of all humans that makes us different than all other apes, which have no such fatty layer. The human infant's extra fatty tissue gives them natural buoyancy. This fatty layer is found in dolphins and all ocean dwelling mammals.

Although most apes have a fear of water, humans are highly attracted to water and will swim for pleasure. Human infants can swim before they can walk. These traits are uncommon among the apes. Humans are also equipped with a diving reflex. This is not found among apes. When a human dips his face in water, the heart rate immediately slows down. This kind of reflex is found in dolphins, whales and all animals that dive.

The infamous freestyle diver, Jacques Mayol, was able to plunge to a depth of over 100 meters during a single held breath. Mayol believes that dolphins were a source of inspiration to him.

Humans perspire as a response to heat. Apes do not. Humans shed tears. Apes do not. The interesting thing about tear glands is that it is commonly found among sea mammals as an adaptation to the marine environment.

When comparing humans and apes, the mechanics of human births are difficult - and among the apes it is not. There is no pelvic cavity in apes and the infant's head is always smaller than the mother's skeleton which makes birthing easy. In humans, birth is painful and often difficult because the infant's head - from the frontal lobes to the back - is larger than the mother's pelvic floor. The shoulders are larger, too, making it necessary for the baby to advance through the birth canal in a spiral motion in order to come out. Dolphin infants also spiral out through the birth canal.

Apes give birth alone, without help, usually in the dead of night, and they eat the placenta. Human births often require help from at least one other and only in certain rare, remote cultures does a human mother eat the placenta. Unique among mammals, dolphin births require an experienced female to be in attendance to help and the placenta is never eaten.

In an upright or horizontal position, the spine of sea mammals is aligned with the hind limbs, as it is in humans. Adaptation to water requires that the spine be very flexible, as it is in both dolphins and humans. This is not so with apes.

And then, of course, there are many studies comparing the similarities of the human and dolphin brain. Dolphins and humans both have huge cerebral (neocortical) development, which is apparently on the same scale. On the other hand, the brain of the ape is very small, with very little neocortex development. Dolphins are amazingly intelligent; there is no question about it. However, how researchers go about determining intelligence is through human perspective. It is not only possible, but highly likely that dolphins have an intelligence that goes well beyond our ability to measure it, and that they use their intelligence in a very different way than we do.

For instance, inside the dolphin brain is a chamber that baffles researchers: recent studies imply that this mysterious area of the brain may serve in achieving meditative states, contemplation or abstract thought. A favorite theory is that this chamber is not only responsible for all these activities, but that it additionally serves in telepathic communication and in visualizing in holographic fashion.

Among the apes, there has been a steady, adaptive increase in brain size throughout their evolutionary period. Yet the prehistoric development of the human brain does not follow this trend: it takes an unprecedented leap forward.

The human brain has become greatly different from the mammals to an extent shared only with the bottlenose dolphin.

Special kinds of lipids, known as the essential fatty acids, are the building blocks for brain tissue. These acids – the omega-6 fatty acids from leafy green and seed-bearing plants and the omega-3 fatty acids from marine phyto-plankton and algae – are used in the human brain in a balance of 1:1 and is shared only with the dolphins which have the same ratio. Biochemicaly, dolphins are still land mammals living in a marine environment.

The list goes on and on, and only a few points of comparisons have been covered: there are many others. Some of you reading this article intuitively know there is truth to these statements and it simply makes sense. Others may need a lot more convincing. However, it's likely that most will agree that dolphins and whales are extraordinary creatures, and it's becoming more difficult to classify them as mere animals. They are, in many ways, the "other humans" who choose to live in the sea.

It's interesting, too, that Jacques Cousteau - legendary ocean explorer - wrote that the original sin was gravity and that we will only achieve redemption when we return to the water - as cetaceans did long ago.

To learn more about the fascinating Aquatic Ape theory, please check out Elaine Morgan's works---author of the highly acclaimed The Descent of Woman and The Aquatic Ape.

If you want to read more on the amazing comparisons with dolphins and humans, read the book Water and Sexuality by internationally acclaimed, Dr. Michel Odent. It isn't really about sexuality: perhaps he gave it that title to attract more readers!

©by Paula Peterson 2003




Humans Genes Closer To Dolphins' Than Any Land Animals
by Seema Kumar

Discovery Channel Online News

January 1998

For years, marine biologists have told us that dolphins share many traits with humans, including intelligence and friendliness. Now, a comparison of dolphin and human chromosomes shows that the genetic make-up of dolphins is amazingly similar to humans.

In fact, researchers at Texas A&M University have found that dolphins have more in common with us genetically than cows, horses or pigs.

"The extent of the genetic similarity came as a real surprise to us," says David Busbee of Texas A&M University, who published his results in last week's Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics.

This information will not only help researchers construct the genetic blueprint of dolphins, but also bolster conservation efforts.

Aided by the progress made in mapping the human genome, researchers will continue to identify individual genes on dolphin chromosomes. Busbee estimates it will save them 20 years of work, and the similarities and differences will reveal how long ago humans and dolphins branched off the evolutionary tree.

Researchers at Texas A&M University applied "paints," or fluorescently labeled human chromosomes, to dolphin chromosomes, and found that 13 of 22 dolphin chromosomes were exactly the same as human chromosomes.

Of the remaining nine dolphin chromosomes, many were combinations or rearrangements of their human counterparts. Researchers also identified three dolphin genes that were similar to human genes.

Until now, researchers have never been able to do genetic studies of dolphins because they are a protected species, making it difficult to get tissues from them. However, Busbee was able to grow colonies of cells from fetal tissues when a female dolphin miscarried.

"Dolphins are marine mammals that swim in the ocean and it was astonishing to learn that we had more in common with the dolphin than with land mammals," says Horst Hameister, professor of medical genetics at the University of Ulm in Germany.

In the past 15 years, the world's dolphin populations have declined considerably, exacerbated by high levels of PCBs. Researchers speculate that PCBs impair the immune systems of dolphins, leaving them vulnerable to disease.

"If we can show that humans are similar to dolphins, and anything that endangers dolphins is an equal concern for humans, it may be easier to persuade governments to become serious about combating industrial pollution and keeping oceans clean," says Busbee.

By Seema Kumar, Discovery Channel Online News




Man

Man
Once
Had
Tiny
Bones
In
His
Tail
But
Were
These
From
The monkey or the whale?
And
Holy cow!
Man had muscles in his ears
And somehow wiggled them to show his fears.
Was this creation or evolution?
Is man
God's divination
Or some
Devil's abomination?
By M.L. Squier





FLYING FISH

Many an animal might wish

That it could be a flying fish

Swimming, Swimming

Swiftly, Swiftly

Upon the water

Then up and away

Into the blue air.

We watch and wonder how

It ever got up there.

Birds watch, too, and remember

Their watery past.

Fish have become birds

That once were just fish.

I sometimes wonder if

Men were once dolphins

Who left the salty sea---

To become you and me---
Homo sapiens?

By M.L. Squier



IT'S ABOUT RENEWABLE RESOURCES AND EVOLUTION


Thursday, July 09, 2009

CROOKED INTELLIGENCE AGENCY






REPORTER:
Does the C.I.A. ever lie?

C.I.A.:
No.

REPORTER:
Was that a lie?

C.I.A.:
Maybe.

REPORTER:
Was the Iraq war based on lies?

C.I.A.:
Maybe.

REPORTER:
Will the sun rise tomorrow?

C.I.A.:
Maybe.

Monday, July 06, 2009

READING BETWEEN THE HONKING COOKINESS AND CASUISTRY



Below is a transcript of Sarah Palin’s speech on Friday, July 3, 2009 in Wasilla, Alaska, as she announced that she would be resigning as governor, as recorded by The New York Times.
Words between brackets are by Mad Plato.

I appreciate you all being here and I just want to say hi to Alaska [And Russia], I appreciate speaking directly to the people that I serve, as governor [And as a rifle-toting soccer mom].
And I thank you all for coming here today on the shores of Lake Lucille [Any Little Richard fans out there?]. This is a source of inspiration for my family and for me. And I’m thankful that Todd flew in last night from commercial fishing grounds in Bristol Bay to stand by my side as always [smelling somewhat rank and randy].
It’s the eve of our celebration [or destruction] of independence as a nation. It’s a time to remember our nation’s dear souls who sacrificed so selflessly so that we all may live in freedom. From the shores of Maine to Texas and California to the tip of Barrow [And my barrel], we live in peace because centuries ago so many fought for something far greater than themselves [something called Land and Oil]. And so many continue to fight for us today and so I say, God bless our military on this eve of Independence Day.
Well, people who know me know that besides faith and family, nothing is more important to me than our beloved Alaska [And her bears, moose, and wolves]. Serving her people is the greatest honor that I could imagine.
Alaska’ mission: to contribute to America. We’re strategic in the world as the air crossroads of the world [and for Vladimir Putin], as a gatekeeper of the continent. And bold visionaries, they knew this [without using hallucinatory drugs or steroids]. And they knew that Alaska would be part of America’s great destiny. This land blessed with clean air and water and wildlife and minerals and oil and gas [and me]. It’s energy. God gave us energy [and we gave ourselves gas…and Alka- Seltzer].
We’re doing so well, my administration. My administration’s accomplishments, they speak for themselves [So why do I need to talk about them?].
We took government out of the dairy business. We put it back into the private-sector’s hands [Around swollen udders] where it should be.
You don’t hear much about the good stuff in the press anymore, though, do you? Some say things changed for me on August 29th last year — the day that John McCain tapped me to be his running mate [My wardrobe changed]. And it was an honor to stand beside a true American hero. I say others changed [their boxers or briefs?].
Political operatives descended on Alaska last August, digging for dirt [When they should’ve been digging for oil].
If I’ve learned one thing it’s that life is about choices and one chooses how to react to circumstances [Just look at how I reacted to David Letterman]. You can choose to engage in things that tear down or that build up and I choose to work very hard on a path for fruitfulness and productivity [and will continue to shoot wolves and moose.] I choose not to tear down and waste precious time [like now] but to build up this state and our great country and her industrious and generous and patriotic and free people.


[Get ready for a very long and tortuous sentence fragment.]
Life is too short [but I’m not] to compromise time and resources and though it may be tempting and more comfortable to just kind of keep your head down and plod along and appease those who are demanding [Demanding what?], hey, just sit down and shut up [But why should I?]. But that’s a worthless, easy path out. That’s a quitter’s way out. And I think a problem in our country today is apathy [and idiopathy]. It would be apathetic to just kind of hunker down and go with the flow. We’re fishermen and we know that only dead fish go with the flow [But don’t live fish swim downstream as well? I need to do more research].

[Get ready for a very long sentence that contains a lot of ANDS]
And I’ll work very hard for others who still believe in free enterprise and smaller government and strong national security for our country and support for our troops and energy independence and for those who will protect freedom and equality and life [AND don’t believe Samuel Johnson when he said that "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel."].
I will support others who seek to serve in or out of office [Mine or theirs], and I don’t care what party they’re in or no party at all [Just as long as I’m the life of the party], inside Alaska or outside of Alaska.
But I won’t do it from the governor’s desk [Or on it]. I’ve never believed that I nor anyone else needs a title to do this…So I choose for my state and for my family more freedom to progress all the way around [In and out…Up and down].
So that Alaska will progress [And not regress], I will not seek re-election as governor. And so as I thought about this announcement, that I wouldn’t run for re-election and what that means for Alaska, I thought about, well, how much fun some governors have as lame ducks [These vocal Wasilla ducks sure aren’t lame]. They [The politicians not the ducks] maybe travel around their state, travel to other states, maybe take their overseas international trade missions. So many politicians do that. And then I thought, that’s what wrong. Many just accept that lame duck status and they hit the road [or fly and then waddle about lamely], they draw a paycheck, they kind of milk it, and I’m not going to put Alaskans through that [I prefer shooting---not milking].
With this announcement that I’m not seeking re-election, I’ve determined it’s best to transfer the authority of governor to Lieutenant Governor Parnell. And I am [not humbly] willing to do this so that this administration [mine] with its positive agenda and its accomplishments and its successful road to an incredible future for Alaska so that it can continue [like this long, run-on sentence fragment] without interruption [except for this one] and with great administrative and legislative success.
[Let me take a deep breath.]
My choice is to take a stand and effect change and not just hit our head [You see, Alaska…you, me, and America are all attached to one big head] against the wall… Rather we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time [Not just space], on another scale [not just the fishy kind], and actually make a difference for our priorities---and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans [and for my run for the Presidency in 2012].
Let me go back quickly to a comfortable analogy for me---sports, basketball [Even though I’m a soccer mom]. And I use it because you are naïve [If that sounds like an insult---too bad] if you don’t see a full-court press from the national level picking away right now. A good point guard, here’s what she does. She drives through a full court press, protecting the ball, keeping her head up because she needs to keep her eye on the basket [Not on her big feet]. And she knows exactly when to pass the ball [And her title and responsibility as governor] so that the team can win. And that is what I’m doing---keeping our eye [You see again how we have the same eye---OUR EYE---in the same head] on the ball that represents sound priorities---you remember they include energy independence and smaller government and national security and freedom!
[And ice cream, baseball, mother, and apple pie all wrapped inside the flag!]
And I know when it’s time to pass the ball for victory [And for my Presidential campaign!].
And I’ve given my reasons now, very candidly, truthfully [And unctuously and superciliously]. And my last day won’t be for another few weeks so the transition will be very smooth [Like creamy peanut butter].
And I really don’t want to disappoint anyone with this announcement [But I guess I think I might have if I need to say that I didn’t want to], not with the decision that I have made. My decision [Not my other personality’s or Todd’s]. All I can ask is that you trust me with this decision and know that it is no more politics as usual [Just the usual politics].
And some Alaskans it seemed today, maybe they don’t mind wasting public dollars and state time but I do [Boy, this last sentence sounds awkward]. And I cannot stand here [Nor sit] as your governor and allow the millions of dollars and all that time go to waste just so that I can hold the title of governor. Some are going to question the timing of this [And the motives]. And let me must say that this decision has been in the works for a while [Just don’t ask why]. In fact, this decision comes after much consideration, prayer and consideration [I forget which one was first]. And finally I polled the most important people in my life, my kids, where the count was unanimous [not anonymous]. Well, in response to asking: “Do you want me to make a positive difference and fight for all our children’s future from outside the governor’s office?” It was four yeses [This word looks strange] and one “hell yeah!” And the “hell yeah” sealed it---and someday I’ll talk about the details of that [Boy, this is one secretive but steamy non sequitur].
And we can all learn from our selfless, selfless troops. These troops and their important missions now, there is where truly the worthy causes are in this world and that’s where our public resources should be our public priority with time and resources spent on that [Another run-on sentence], not on this superficial, wasteful political bloodsport [War is bloody, but it’s not a sport]. So may we all learn from them [If they survive].
Really, we’ve just got to put first things first [And not second things second]. And first things first as governor, I love my job and I love Alaska [And power…and time to write my book…and money...and the 2012 Presidency]. And it hurts [But not as much as it gives me pleasure] to make this choice but I’m doing what’s best for Alaska [And for me…and you…my family…America…and the world], and I have explained why [But don’t ask me why]. Though I think of the saying on my parents’ refrigerator [At least I think it’s a refrigerator], a little magnet that says, “Don’t explain: your friends don’t need it and your enemies won’t believe you anyway.”
But I’ve given my reasons. It’s no more politics as usual [Or lies as usual that are repeated] and I’m taking my fight for what’s right for Alaska in a new direction […to Washington, D.C].
Now, despite this, I sure don’t want anyone, any Alaskan dissuaded from entering politics after seeing this real climate change that began in August [You see, I do believe the climate has changed, but I still say, “Drill, baby, drill”]. No, we need hardworking, average Americans fighting for what’s right. And I will support you because we need you and you can effect change, and I can [affect change] too on the outside.
We need those who will respect our Constitution where government’s supposed to serve from the bottom up [Not the head down], and not move toward this top down [What the heck does this mean?] big government takeover but rather will be protectors of individual rights---[Just not for those on the left] who also have enough common sense to acknowledge when conditions have drastically changed and are willing to call an audible and pass the ball [Don’t they do this in football? Wasn’t I using basketball as my analogy? Oh well…] when it’s time so the team can win. And that’s what I’m doing [playing basketball and soccer].
Remember Alaska, America is now, more than ever, looking north to the future [But I’m looking East]. And it’ll be good [What do I mean by good?]. So God bless you, and from me and from my family to all Alaska, you have my heart [But not my brain].
And we’re going to be in really great hands, the capable [Not culpable] hands of our lieutenant governor, Sean Parnell. And Lt. Gen. Craig Campbell then will assume the role of lieutenant governor. And it is my promise to you that I will always be standing by, ready to assist [Just call me when you want some wolves and moose thinned out].
Take the words of General MacArthur. He said: “We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.” [East…not West...to Washington, D.C.]




Sunday, July 05, 2009

SEX DRUGS POLITICS AND THE DOG'S GOT THE FLU








We don't have Sarah Palin to kick around any longer
(Not until she tries to become a senator or president).

Michael Jackson's gone
(Don't murder all of the lawyers just yet).

Republicans are dropping like flies
(Like wanton flies).

America is still at war
(What's new?).

North Korea wants to attack Hawaii
(Keep paying your taxes).

Move over swine flu
(The dog flu is here).

Saturday, July 04, 2009

BLACK CATS ZEBRAS AND BOMBS




On one Fourth of July I woke up and thought that I was hearing the start of World War III.

It wasn't.

It was just a fusillade of fireworks:


Popping! Hissing! Fizzles!

My lust for fireworks and the anticipation to ignite them arrived long before my puberty and confused adolescence.

In June I began looking for the first sentinels of July Fourth:
FIREWORKS STANDS.
As good as waiting for Christmas and Easter.

There must be something innate in humans to want to explode “things”.

To hear loud noises.

Smoke and sulfur don’t bother us that much.


Unless it's the Devil.




***


Reverie

The beautiful face of a child
Looked across the open world
And saw the sky and ocean turn upside down.
All the myriad stars fell into the hair
Of the beautiful child
And he burned like a sun.
And on another intelligent planet
The face of another beautiful child
Smiled as he saw in the dark heavens
A huge brilliant explosion
Of ten billion stars
Disappearing.

It was the Fourth of July.
By M.L. Squier








Tuesday, June 30, 2009

MEMOIRS OF DICK


GWB:
Dick?

DC:
Quack!

GWB:
Hey, sharpshooter, I hear you're writing your memoirs.

DC:
Quack!

GWB:
Great!

DC:
Quack!

GWB:
Gone hunting lately?
DC:
Quack!

GWB:
Great!

DC:
Quack!

GWB:
Well, I better let you get back to your memories.

DC:
Quack!



IT WAS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!

Monday, June 29, 2009

BIG BODY SMALL BRAIN




REPORTER:
Senator, are you ready to vote yes on this new law to slow down Climate Change.

SENATOR:
Climate Change my foot! It's going to be just as hot or cold as it ever was.


REPORTER:
Does this mean that you reject the consensus of scientific studies that predict serious climate changes?


SENATOR:
Yes, I reject this nonsense. Do you think that I drive my big Cadillac just for my health? One way or another---with or without us humans---climate is going to change.


REPORTER:
But what about rising sea levels that will flood seacoasts?


SENATOR:
Good for business. Good for fishing and sailing. Give folks more time to relax in the waters of Mother Nature.


REPORTER:
What about drought?


SENATOR:
What about it? How about a nice, cold beer? When there's a drought, I do something about it.


REPORTER:
Finally senator, don't you believe that the carbon footprint should get smaller, and that we should be less dependent on foreign oil?


SENATOR:

No. We have to keep the other half of the world happy to maintain world peace. We must continue to buy foreign oil if we want to remain friends with our Muslim and Arab brothers. Well, if you'll excuse me, it's time for me to gas up my Cad so I can take a cruise in the country. I just love hearing her engine purr!



IT'S ABOUT RENEWABLE RESOURCES!





Wednesday, June 24, 2009

NOT OUT FOR A WALK



REPORTER:
Governor, why didn’t you tell anyone that you were leaving?

MARK SANFORD:
I needed to get out of Dodge pronto. I needed some R & R fast, or I thought that I might explode.

REPORTER:
But you weren’t on the Appalachian Trail? Why?

MARK SANFORD:
As much as I enjoy that part of the world, I felt that my psyche needed a more exotic environment.

REPORTER:
Did you travel alone?

MARK SANFORD:
As far as I remember.

REPORTER:
Governor, do you think that this spontaneous and secret disappearance will affect your plans to be a candidate in the 2012 Presidential Election?

MARK SANFORD:
I believe that the memory of most Americans is short. I will still be a candidate.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

COSMIC SOUP




ReiNA:
They’re still on our tails.
DeeNA:
Who are they…and what tails? You and I don’t have tails.
ReiNA:
“They” are the prebiotic scientists who want to figure out how life began.
DeeNA:
Those crazy buzzards just won’t leave us alone!
ReiNA:
I know. They should just stick to what the Bible says.
DeeNA:
Yeah, then scientists might not be chasing our tails all of the time.
ReiNA:
My question is why is it so important to know how life began?
DeeNA:
Right. Just accept life for what it is. Go shopping. See a movie. Have a beer.
ReiNA:
Humans are a very inquisitive species, that’s for sure.
DeeNA:
Maybe it's that Greek guy’s fault who said that
the unexamined life is not worth living.

***


New Glimpses of Life’s Puzzling Origins



Published: June 15, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/science/16orig.html?em
Some 3.9 billion years ago, a shift in the orbit of the Sun’s outer planets sent a surge of large comets and asteroids careening into the inner solar system. Their violent impacts gouged out the large craters still visible on the Moon’s face, heated Earth’s surface into molten rock and boiled off its oceans into an incandescent mist.

Yet rocks that formed on Earth 3.8 billion years ago, almost as soon as the bombardment had stopped, contain possible evidence of biological processes. If life can arise from inorganic matter so quickly and easily, why is it not abundant in the solar system and beyond? If biology is an inherent property of matter, why have chemists so far been unable to reconstruct life, or anything close to it, in the laboratory?
The origins of life on Earth bristle with puzzle and paradox. Which came first, the proteins of living cells or the genetic information that makes them? How could the metabolism of living things get started without an enclosing membrane to keep all the necessary chemicals together? But if life started inside a cell membrane, how did the necessary nutrients get in?
The questions may seem moot, since life did start somehow. But for the small group of researchers who insist on learning exactly how it started, frustration has abounded. Many once-promising leads have led only to years of wasted effort. Scientists as eminent as Francis Crick, the chief theorist of molecular biology, have quietly suggested that life may have formed elsewhere before seeding the planet, so hard does it seem to find a plausible explanation for its emergence on Earth.
In the last few years, however, four surprising advances have renewed confidence that a terrestrial explanation for life’s origins will eventually emerge.
One is a series of discoveries about the cell-like structures that could have formed naturally from fatty chemicals likely to have been present on the primitive Earth. This lead emerged from a long argument between three colleagues as to whether a genetic system or a cell membrane came first in the development of life. They eventually agreed that genetics and membranes had to have evolved together.
The three researchers, Jack W. Szostak, David P. Bartel and P. Luigi Luisi, published a somewhat adventurous manifesto in Nature in 2001, declaring that the way to make a synthetic cell was to get a protocell and a genetic molecule to grow and divide in parallel, with the molecules being encapsulated in the cell. If the molecules gave the cell a survival advantage over other cells, the outcome would be “a sustainable, autonomously replicating system, capable of Darwinian evolution,” they wrote.
“It would be truly alive,” they added.
One of the authors, Dr. Szostak, of the Massachusetts General Hospital, has since managed to achieve a surprising amount of this program.
Simple fatty acids, of the sort likely to have been around on the primitive Earth, will spontaneously form double-layered spheres, much like the double-layered membrane of today’s living cells. These protocells will incorporate new fatty acids fed into the water, and eventually divide.
Living cells are generally impermeable and have elaborate mechanisms for admitting only the nutrients they need. But Dr. Szostak and his colleagues have shown that small molecules can easily enter the protocells. If they combine into larger molecules, however, they cannot get out, just the arrangement a primitive cell would need. If a protocell is made to encapsulate a short piece of DNA and is then fed with nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA, the nucleotides will spontaneously enter the cell and link into another DNA molecule.
At a symposium on evolution at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island last month, Dr. Szostak said he was “optimistic about getting a chemical replication system going” inside a protocell. He then hopes to integrate a replicating nucleic acid system with dividing protocells.
Dr. Szostak’s experiments have come close to creating a spontaneously dividing cell from chemicals assumed to have existed on the primitive Earth. But some of his ingredients, like the nucleotide building blocks of nucleic acids, are quite complex. Prebiotic chemists, who study the prelife chemistry of the primitive Earth, have long been close to despair over how nucleotides could ever have arisen spontaneously.
Nucleotides consist of a sugar molecule, like ribose or deoxyribose, joined to a base at one end and a phosphate group at the other. Prebiotic chemists discovered with delight that bases like adenine will easily form from simple chemicals like hydrogen cyanide. But years of disappointment followed when the adenine proved incapable of linking naturally to the ribose.
Last month, John Sutherland, a chemist at the University of Manchester in England, reported in Nature his discovery of a quite unexpected route for synthesizing nucleotides from prebiotic chemicals. Instead of making the base and sugar separately from chemicals likely to have existed on the primitive Earth, Dr. Sutherland showed how under the right conditions the base and sugar could be built up as a single unit, and so did not need to be linked.
“I think the Sutherland paper has been the biggest advance in the last five years in terms of prebiotic chemistry,” said Gerald F. Joyce, an expert on the origins of life at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif.

Once a self-replicating system develops from chemicals, this is the beginning of genetic history, since each molecule carries the imprint of its ancestor. Dr. Crick, who was interested in the chemistry that preceded replication, once observed, “After this point, the rest is just history.”
Dr. Joyce has been studying the possible beginning of history by developing RNA molecules with the capacity for replication. RNA, a close cousin of DNA, almost certainly preceded it as the genetic molecule of living cells. Besides carrying information, RNA can also act as an enzyme to promote chemical reactions. Dr. Joyce reported in Science earlier this year that he had developed two RNA molecules that can promote each other’s synthesis from the four kinds of RNA nucleotides.
“We finally have a molecule that’s immortal,” he said, meaning one whose information can be passed on indefinitely. The system is not alive, he says, but performs central functions of life like replication and adapting to new conditions.
“Gerry Joyce is getting ever closer to showing you can have self-replication of RNA species,” Dr. Sutherland said. “So only a pessimist wouldn’t allow him success in a few years.”
Another striking advance has come from new studies of the handedness of molecules. Some chemicals, like the amino acids of which proteins are made, exist in two mirror-image forms, much like the left and right hand. In most naturally occurring conditions they are found in roughly equal mixtures of the two forms. But in a living cell all amino acids are left-handed, and all sugars and nucleotides are right-handed.
Prebiotic chemists have long been at a loss to explain how the first living systems could have extracted just one kind of the handed chemicals from the mixtures on the early Earth. Left-handed nucleotides are a poison because they prevent right-handed nucleotides linking up in a chain to form nucleic acids like RNA or DNA. Dr. Joyce refers to the problem as “original syn,” referring to the chemist’s terms syn and anti for the structures in the handed forms.
The chemists have now been granted an unexpected absolution from their original syn problem. Researchers like Donna Blackmond of Imperial College London have discovered that a mixture of left-handed and right-handed molecules can be converted to just one form by cycles of freezing and melting.
With these four recent advances — Dr. Szostak’s protocells, self-replicating RNA, the natural synthesis of nucleotides, and an explanation for handedness — those who study the origin of life have much to be pleased about, despite the distance yet to go. “At some point some of these threads will start joining together,” Dr. Sutherland said. “I think all of us are far more optimistic now than we were five or 10 years ago.”
One measure of the difficulties ahead, however, is that so far there is little agreement on the kind of environment in which life originated. Some chemists, like Günther Wächtershäuser, argue that life began in volcanic conditions, like those of the deep sea vents. These have the gases and metallic catalysts in which, he argues, the first metabolic processes were likely to have arisen.
But many biologists believe that in the oceans, the necessary constituents of life would always be too diluted. They favor a warm freshwater pond for the origin of life, as did Darwin, where cycles of wetting and evaporation around the edges could produce useful concentrations and chemical processes.
No one knows for sure when life began. The oldest generally accepted evidence for living cells are fossil bacteria 1.9 billion years old from the Gunflint Formation of Ontario. But rocks from two sites in Greenland, containing an unusual mix of carbon isotopes that could be evidence of biological processes, are 3.830 billion years old.
How could life have gotten off to such a quick start, given that the surface of the Earth was probably sterilized by the Late Heavy Bombardment, the rain of gigantic comets and asteroids that pelted the Earth and Moon around 3.9 billion years ago? Stephen Mojzsis, a geologist at the University of Colorado who analyzed one of the Greenland sites, argued in Nature last month that the Late Heavy Bombardment would not have killed everything, as is generally believed. In his view, life could have started much earlier and survived the bombardment in deep sea environments.
Recent evidence from very ancient rocks known as zircons suggests that stable oceans and continental crust had emerged as long as 4.404 billion years ago, a mere 150 million years after the Earth’s formation. So life might have had half a billion years to get started before the cataclysmic bombardment.
But geologists dispute whether the Greenland rocks really offer signs of biological processes, and geochemists have often revised their estimates of the composition of the primitive atmosphere. Leslie Orgel, a pioneer of prebiotic chemistry, used to say, “Just wait a few years, and conditions on the primitive Earth will change again,” said Dr. Joyce, a former student of his.
Chemists and biologists are thus pretty much on their own in figuring out how life started. For lack of fossil evidence, they have no guide as to when, where or how the first forms of life emerged. So they will figure life out only by reinventing it in the laboratory.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

DON'T KNOCK IT OFF!




Sarah Palin:
My desire to run for public office in 2012 will use any and all means to win.

Reporter:
Even bad jokes?

Sarah Palin:
Even bad jokes, and particularly those that are told at the expense of my daughters.

Reporter:
David Letterman has just apologized to you and your daughters----in fact, to the whole world. Are you now satisfied that this issue has been resolved?

Sarah Palin:
No.
I won’t let this issue go away until David Letterman does.
I will milk his bad joke for everything it’s worth.

Reporter:
Does this mean that you will run for president in 2012?

Sarah Palin:
You betcha.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got to get on a helicopter.
Fellas, bring both of my rifles for this hunting trip.


Monday, June 15, 2009

FLU VACCINE: SWINDLE OR SOLUTION?


Beware of others who say that they can save you from something or someone, OR for that matter, from your own self. The last is perhaps a more believable and practical possibility on life’s chessboard (or cheese board).

In this case, that something is THE SWINE FLU, whose deliverance from (we are being told) can be given to us via new vaccines which are currently and hastily being “hatched” (eggs will not be used in some vaccines), or one might more accurately say, concocted-created.

The tasty swine are receiving the blame for this pandemic, but who and what are the real cause(s)?

Will we and can we ever know?

We have “blind faith” in science and doctors…

In Progress itself.

That is why I was very surprised when a public school nurse recently told me:

“All of them are crooks!”.

By them she meant doctors.

Doctors?

Crooks?

ALL OF THEM?

This a very hard and large pill to swallow.

Doctors (like priests used to) get our respect.

We sometimes have anger for the long time that we must wait to see doctors, and we are envious (or jealous) about how much money they can make.

But we trust doctors because they are the trained experts and we are not.

We think they are smarter than us.

However, now that there is the Internet, we can do our own research about medicines and diseases.

Sometimes what we read gives us other big and hard pills to swallow. Our bubbles are burst because the opinions and knowledge we have are something quite different from what we have always believed to be the “gospel truth”.

When we begin to learn that some things are much different from what we have always thought them to be, then we become suspicious and doubtful about other things.

The vaccines being made for Swine Flu H1N1 is just one more example.

We should keep our eyes, ears, and minds critically open in the days to come.


For additional information on this topic go to:
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=47&contentid=5970&page=2






Thursday, June 11, 2009

WORLD CLASS CITIZENS





The other day Newt Gingrich told the world that he was not a citizen of the world.

Indeed.

What planet are you from, Mr. Gingrich?

Which galaxy?

What Universe?

We already knew that you weren’t a very wise or humane citizen of this world after you
---One of its non-terrestrial denizens---
Told us that Sonia Sotomayor was a racist.

Meanwhile, Mr.
El Rush-Blob Limbaugh---
Joined to “lip and hip” with Mr. Gingrich---
Continues to besmirch with his own boastful brush strokes of outrageous offal.

While one cannot (and should not) agree with EVERYTHING that President Obama is doing, the citizens of America and of the world are relieved that there is a new American president who is talking and working as though there is only ONE PLANET, and that he
---The most powerful leader in the world (Galaxy?)---
Is attempting to heal America and the planet instead of abandoning them.

P.S.
Dear Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich:
“…how noisy in clamor and abuse, how weak in judgment and reason, appear all your arguments!”

Sunday, May 24, 2009

THE LINK IS STILL MISSING


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7656993/12-million-year-old-ape-fossil-straight-legs-missing-link-primates-humans.html





That 47,000,000 year-old lizard-creature may have had finger nails, but did it ever bite them?

I don’t think so.

It also didn’t have the stress that you and I have.

This dinosaur-like animal is missing more than just munching on its finger nails.

It doesn’t even faintly resemble me or you by any stretch of the imagination.

And how in the world does any scientist know whether this creature has any connection whatsoever to humans?

Any connection seems to be as likely as finding an extraterrestrial buried in my backyard.

I’ve never been fond of being linked on the evolutionary chain (or whatever you want to call it) to monkeys or apes.

But I like the name Ida.

And David Letterman might be right when he said that he thought that Arnold Schwarzenegger was the missing link between man and monkey.


***


Scientists in New York unveiled on Tuesday the skeleton of what they said could be the common ancestor to humans, apes and other primates.
The tiny creature, officially known as Darwinius masillae, but dubbed Ida, lived 47 million years ago and is unusually well preserved, missing only part of a leg, or five per cent of the skeleton. The skull of 'missing link' Ida The unveiling of Ida, a perfectly preserved fossil thought to be the most complete primate skeleton ever discovered. The finding, described on Tuesday in the PloS ONE scientific journal, was displayed at a press conference at New York's Natural History Museum, and is due to be the subject of a documentary on the History Channel, BBC and other broadcasters. Organisers said that scientists led by Norway's fossil expert, professor Jorn Hurum, worked for two years on Ida, first discovered in 1983 by private collectors who failed to understand her importance - and split the bones into two lots. The monkey-like creature was preserved through the ages in Germany's Messel Pit, a crater rich in Eocene Epoch fossils. Although bearing a long tail, she had several human characteristics, including an opposable thumb, short arms and legs, and forward facing eyes. She also lacked two key elements of modern lemurs: a grooming claw and a row of lower teeth known as the toothcomb. "This is the first link to all humans - truly a fossil that links world heritage," Prof Hurum said in a statement. David Attenborough, the renowned British naturalist and broadcaster, said the "little creature is going to show us our connection with all the rest of the mammals". "The link they would have said until now is missing... it is no longer missing," he said. Ida gives a glimpse into a time when the world was just taking its present shape. Dinosaurs were extinct, the Himalayas were forming and a huge range of mammals thrived in vast jungles. According to the international team, Ida had suffered a badly broken wrist and this might have been her undoing. The theory is that while drinking from the Messel lake she was overcome by carbon dioxide fumes and fell in. "Ida slipped into unconsciousness, was washed into the lake, and sank to the bottom, where the unique conditions preserved her for 47 million years," a statement said. Her last meal shows she was a herbivore. Gut contents revealed remains of fruits, seeds and leaves. "This fossil is so complete. Everything's there. It's unheard of in the primate record at all. You have to get to human burial to see something that's this complete," Hurum said. The press conference was unusually strongly hyped for a scientific event and the announcement was tied into a media campaign including the release of the documentary.

http://www.theage.com.au/world/science/meet-the-ancestor-47millionyearold-human-link-revealed-20090520-bezq.html

Saturday, May 16, 2009

OUT OF THE DARKNESS WITH A BANG













In this photo provided by NASA, astronaut Michael Good works with the Hubble Space Telescope in the cargo bay of the earth-orbiting space shuttle Atlantis, Friday, May 15, 2009. Astronauts Good and Mike Massimino, not shown, participated in the second session of STS-125 extravehicular activity, as part of a five-day beehive-like agenda of space walking and work on the giant orbital observatory (AP Photo/NASA)


***


Our earthly eyes may soon get to see what the beginning of “our” Universe looked like.
But not its very, very beginning.
Only 600,000,000 years before The Beginning.
But what if the Universe (as we think we know it) is much older than the oft’-quoted age of between 13.5 and 14 billion years?
What if (like other misconceptions we’ve held about the earth and sun) OUR universe is a tangential part of a much larger UNIVERSE?)
I know: I’m being heretical and ridiculous.

I suppose that our terrestrial peering into the heavens will help in some areas of our terrestrial existence.
Can this kind of information help us to pay our bills?
Win wars?
Cure cancer?
Stop Global Warming?
Paint pictures or write poetry?
What is it really worth for us to be able to get to and discover the “starting gate” of Space and Time?
What’s the point of all this cosmic seeing?
Will it help us to know ourselves better or to solve our problems?If the universe didn’t exist would it be necessary to create one?
I find this sort of research interesting, but I don’t always see any abundant intrinsic or extrinsic value.
The mountain is there. It will not come to us. So we must go to the mountain.

Maybe on the way we’ll bump into some of our extraterrestrial cousins.
“Hello. Are you old enough to remember the BIG BANG? "
"Of course."
“Good. Larry King wants you to be on his show tomorrow night.”

In the meantime, I look forward to seeing more beautiful pictures between all of those infinite spaces.
But I have a suggestion for NASA:
Please point Hubble’s eye to the center of the Milky Way Galaxy and keep it pointed there until we find out what is going to happen (if anything) in 2012.

Maybe you can tell us if Dick Cheney is going to run for president.



IT'S ABOUT RENEWABLE RESOURCES THE BIG BANG AND 2016



Wednesday, May 13, 2009

SOUL SEARCHING NOT FINGER POINTING


Born, baptized, and confirmed in the Catholic Church, and one who appreciates the mysterious and beautiful writing in the New Testament (King James)...
I become suspicious when people point fingers at God.

Leave God alone.

He has enough to worry about.

He has to worry about this cruel and murderous species of HOMO ERECTUS THE SAPIEN (a species that is more often erect and supine than ethical).

So, for the sake of our survival---for the sake of saving our planet---God would be much happier if we didn't bring his name up so much.

Just look at ourselves.

Within ourselves.

INTO YOUR SOUL.

Be Good, True, and Beautiful.

And for these things we don’t need to be a

Christian, Catholic, Protestant, Baptist, Muslim, Buddhist, Jew, or Atheist.


Friday, May 08, 2009

DICK IS SICK


Dick Cheney was drunk on power.


Vice Dick continues to be intoxicated by boundless fumes of his self-deluding duplicity.

The former Vice President (with emphasis on the vice part) is still torturing us with tortuous and treacherous enhanced techniques of treachery.

Dick’s a big liar.

What else should we expect from Dick?

Dick thought he was shooting a bird when he was shooting a man.

Dick told us over and over that Iraq had WMD.

This chicanery gave Dick’s Halliburton and Pentagon buddies years and years of blood money.

Monsters need to be muzzled and jailed.

So?

What

Should

We do

With

DICK?

Sunday, May 03, 2009

WHILE ADMINISTERING THE TAKS TEST DURING THE SWINE FLU SEASON

the filigree of a young tree
became enticing to me
but the tapestry
of its tender flame
made me want to scream.