Saturday, August 16, 2008

Q & A

Can the author of the swift boat book sink two Democrats in a row?

Yes, such a book might whip up a swirling whirlpool of doubts and innuendoes, whether the book is read or not.

Just hearing the pundits swish this swirling swill will be unfavorable to Obama.

The voters are going to hear the negative components of this book, and it may swiftly drown Obama’s chances to win in November.

Obama must counter with swift and honest rebuttals, which is already being done.



Is John McCain hypocritical to condemn Russia for invading Georgia when he voted to invade Iraq?

McCain is hypocritical with a HUMONGOUS capital “h”.

After eight years of “SuperHyperHypocrisy”, McCain is just wagging the tail on the same damned dog.




What would Colin Powell’s endorsement mean for Barack Obama?

It would be powerful.

If Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama, and then Obama chose Powell to be his running mate, I believe that America would overwhelmingly select these two instead of McCain and Lieberman (or whoever).

Even though Mr. Powell was “fed” misinformation (by Cheney and Tenet), then spewed it out at the U.N., voters know that he is overall a very astute and capable leader who offsets the McCain claim of being the “experienced war veteran” who would lead better than Barack Obama.





When it comes to the convention, has Barack Obama let Hillary Clinton take over?

I could write that Hillary Clinton is a stubborn loser in a pantsuit that should just swallow her pride, but I won’t.

Let her in on the power and the glory; let her supporters be appeased.

Obama and his handlers must know more than we do, or they surely would not be shining the light so brightly upon Bill and Hillary.



Why are members of the military donating more money to Barack Obama despite John McCain’s military background?

These courageous soldiers know the lies that put them in MessOpotamia.

Obama knew it would be a mistake to invade Iraq, and he has been proven right.
The titles of McBush and McSame for John McCain indicate what John McCain isn't about.

He isn’t about change.

He isn’t much different from Bush.

The military wants Barack Obama to lead them out of the debacle that the Bush administration created.



Why isn’t there more support for third party candidates?

As an aging but still wise Gore Vidal has told us many times, there is really only one party in America, and that is the Money Party, even though Democrats paint themselves differently from Republicans.

A third party candidate, even if he or she is super-rich, will never get enough votes.

As much as Americans are fed up with the two political parties, they know that a third party could never win.

Not enough people will vote for the third party for it to win.

So, voters are forced to pick the lesser of two evils.

Democracy?


No comments: