All delays are dangerous in war.-
John Dryden Tyrannic Love, act i.
Delays have dangerous ends.
King Henry VI. Part I. Act iii. Sc.
We'll succeed untless we quit.
George W. Bush
11-17-05
To attack or not to attack?
Iran is a festering sore.
Impale the monster before it grows bigger and “badder”?
Or wait?
Iraq was unnecessary.
Iraq was a mistake.
It was a blunder.
The danger, now, is that the U.S. has a weak hand to deal with Iran because the U.S. blundered in Iraq.
Or, one should say, BECAUSE GEORGE W. BUSH BLUNDERED.
And now, the Long War President blusters and blusters instead of admitting his BLUNDER(S).
The "mission was accomplished" for the Decider, but now the "job must be done" until there is VICTORY IN IRAQ..
But...
To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war. said
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874-1965).
George W. Bush should talk with the Iranian leadership.
Not out of weakness, but from confidence and strength.
America is not a paper tiger.
But America is an angry animal in Iraq fighting angry monsters.
Israel’s intransigence, plus America’s occupation of Iraq, is heating up Iran’s
nuclear ambitions.
Diplomacy, anyone?
There Are Four US Carriers In The Gulf
November 7, 2006,
On Oct. 31, the two nuclear-powered carriers, the USS Eisenhower and USS Enterprise, arrived in Bahrain, accompanied by their carrier strike groups. On Nov 9th, the USS Iwo Jima, and the USS Boxer also arrived. The presence of these carriers, combined with Israel's talk of a Iranian strike, sort of makes a person wonder if Bush is up to something. Assault Carriers and Full carriers
If Bush plans on going into Iran, there must be a massive attack on the Fifth Fleet, or a nuke in an American city. The trouble is - Israel knows it too.
rense.com
John Dryden Tyrannic Love, act i.
Delays have dangerous ends.
King Henry VI. Part I. Act iii. Sc.
We'll succeed untless we quit.
George W. Bush
11-17-05
To attack or not to attack?
Iran is a festering sore.
Impale the monster before it grows bigger and “badder”?
Or wait?
Iraq was unnecessary.
Iraq was a mistake.
It was a blunder.
The danger, now, is that the U.S. has a weak hand to deal with Iran because the U.S. blundered in Iraq.
Or, one should say, BECAUSE GEORGE W. BUSH BLUNDERED.
And now, the Long War President blusters and blusters instead of admitting his BLUNDER(S).
The "mission was accomplished" for the Decider, but now the "job must be done" until there is VICTORY IN IRAQ..
But...
To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war. said
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874-1965).
George W. Bush should talk with the Iranian leadership.
Not out of weakness, but from confidence and strength.
America is not a paper tiger.
But America is an angry animal in Iraq fighting angry monsters.
Israel’s intransigence, plus America’s occupation of Iraq, is heating up Iran’s
nuclear ambitions.
Diplomacy, anyone?
There Are Four US Carriers In The Gulf
November 7, 2006,
On Oct. 31, the two nuclear-powered carriers, the USS Eisenhower and USS Enterprise, arrived in Bahrain, accompanied by their carrier strike groups. On Nov 9th, the USS Iwo Jima, and the USS Boxer also arrived. The presence of these carriers, combined with Israel's talk of a Iranian strike, sort of makes a person wonder if Bush is up to something. Assault Carriers and Full carriers
If Bush plans on going into Iran, there must be a massive attack on the Fifth Fleet, or a nuke in an American city. The trouble is - Israel knows it too.
rense.com
No comments:
Post a Comment